Who we serve · Directors of Professional Learning

Professional learning measured by what changed, not who signed in.

You can prove the hours, but not that they stuck. engage2learn measures coaching by what changes in classrooms, works with your coaches on the Jim Knight coaching model, and turns Title II reporting from a project back into a report.

What’s on your desk

You built the coaching, and now you have to prove it works.

A director of professional learning owns the PD calendar, the coaching framework and the federal reporting, and is asked every spring whether any of it worked.

On the PL director’s desk

  • Hours logged, and no proof the PD changed a classroom.

    Coaching measured in GroweLab by what changed, as it happens.

  • Every school’s coaching looks different.

    One coaching model across schools, the Jim Knight Impact Cycle, through the Coaches Academy.

  • Title II reporting eating time meant for coaching.

    The reporting that took 40 hours becomes 4.

  • Coaches who need development of their own.

    The Coaching Effectiveness Assessment shows each coach’s strengths and next steps.

  • Teachers tired out by the second initiative of the year.

    Coaching on what teachers are already teaching, not one more thing.

Your year with us

From the PD calendar to the impact report.

Scroll through a professional learning director’s year, and what you would see from engage2learn in each season.

  1. SummerJul–Aug

    Build the calendar around coaching.

    The PD calendar and coach cohort planning. New coaches start the year learning one model rather than five.

    From engage2learn

    A Coaches Academy cohort for your coaches.

  2. FallSep–Oct

    Coaching cycles, and the first real data.

    Coaching cycles begin and the first walkthrough data arrives. You see the instructional moves teachers are making.

    From engage2learn

    Coaching cycles and walkthroughs recorded in GroweLab.

  3. WinterDec–Jan

    A mid-year review of the coaching itself.

    The mid-year coaching review. You see which coaches are moving teachers and where each one can grow.

    From engage2learn

    A Coaching Effectiveness Assessment readout by coach.

  4. SpringFeb–Apr

    Title II season, without the forty hours.

    Title II reporting and RFPs. The year’s coaching data is already in one place.

    From engage2learn

    The reporting that took 40 hours becomes 4.

  5. Late springMay–Jun

    An impact analysis you can defend.

    PD impact analysis and renewals. You bring evidence of classroom change to the budget conversation.

    From engage2learn

    A year of coaching impact, by school and by coach.

The research base

Coaching measurement with research behind it.

30
years of Jim Knight’s instructional coaching research, begun in 1996
150,000+
instructional coaches trained through Jim Knight and the Instructional Coaching Group
10
years of peer-reviewed research and five large-scale studies (Rutgers, ASU) behind the Coaching Effectiveness Assessment

Beyond engage2learn’s own work, Matthew Kraft’s meta-analysis of teacher coaching found large effects on teacher practice (Kraft, Blazar and Hogan, Review of Educational Research, 2018).

From our research partner

Coaching aligned to the research that measures it.

Dr. Reddy’s studies are the research base of the Coaching Effectiveness Assessment. engage2learn’s coaching carries ESSA Tier 2 / Tier 3 evidence, the standard a Title II review looks for.

engage2learn was the only coaching organization we found that was already aligned to our research. We know the experts at engage2learn will be able to scale the impact of our validated assessment data insights and provide measurable results for schools.
Dr. Linda ReddyFounder of ReadyCoach and Associate Dean of Research, Rutgers University · research partner
FAQ

Questions leaders ask.

Who is engage2learn, and how is it different from a vendor who sells one piece?

engage2learn is one partner that runs the whole cycle of educator effectiveness itself: diagnose, design, coach, and connect to community. Most districts buy those pieces from several vendors; with one partner, the assessment, the plan and the coaching all aim at the same educator skills, and your professional learning team works with one team rather than several.

What does the first conversation involve?

The first conversation is about the student-outcome gap you want to close and what you have already tried. There is no pitch deck. We listen, ask what your data and your schools are showing, and suggest where to start, often with an assessment, because the assessment comes first.

How do we know it is working this year?

Classroom practice is tracked in GroweLab as it improves. Walkthroughs, coaching cycles and educator growth show up during the year, by school, so progress is visible long before the end-of-year results.

How is professional learning measured by what changed, not by hours?

Coaching is recorded in GroweLab as it happens, so you see coaching cycles, the instructional moves observed in walkthroughs and each teacher’s growth, not attendance. The Coaching Effectiveness Assessment adds a research-validated read of how well the coaching itself is working.

Start here

Prove what your PD changed this year.

Tell us how your coaching runs today and what your Title II report asks for, and we’ll show you what measuring it by classroom change would look like.

Four educators wearing lanyards talk in a circle of chairs in a classroom, a man in a dark blazer leaning in to listen as a colleague speaks, bookshelves and a whiteboard behind them